Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maddison Inglis vs Indy De Vroome Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Inglis vs Vroome analysis and find out who is favored!
Maddison Inglis vs Indy De Vroome Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Inglis 1 - 0 Vroome
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Inglis has won 46.82% of points on their second serve, while Vroome has won 39.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Inglis, in recent form, has won 55.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vroome has won 57.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.62% and 21.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Inglis has saved 55.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vroome has saved 80% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Inglis has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 32/ 22), with Vroome winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Inglis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 32/ 20), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Vroome has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 88/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Inglis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 28/ 18), where as Vroome has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Inglis winning 1 times and Vroome being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Vroome winning 0. The last match between Inglis and Vroome was at the Wimbledon - London, 21-06-2022, Q1 round, Grass with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 7-6(8) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Inglis and Vroome have played a deciding set 0 times, with Inglis winning 0 times and Vroome 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Inglis winning 1, and Vroome 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Inglis has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.61 while Vroome has played against players with an average rank of 445.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Inglis has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vroome has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Inglis has converted 46.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vroome has converted 25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
243
Rank
112
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
644
Rank
177
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
59% (252-177)
Career Total W/L
56% (218-169)
64% (21-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$423,460
Career Prize Money
$46,573
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Maddison Inglis vs Indy De Vroome For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Inglis VS Vroome
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Indy De Vroome |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (36/70) | 47% (35/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (25/36) | 69% (24/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (17/34) | 31% (12/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (38/74) | 40% (28/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 6-1 |
Stats 
Maddison Inglis
Player
Indy De Vroome
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maddison Inglis | Indy De Vroome |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (21/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (49/31) | 50% (1/1) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (406/338) | 50% (6/6) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 144 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 301.33 | 706 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1385/2265) | 43% (21/49) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (908/1385) | 86% (18/21) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (412/880) | 39% (11/28) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (142/303) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1130/2463) | 35% (13/37) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (18/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (21/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (7/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (20/16) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (20/4) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Maddison Inglis
37%
(
14 of
38)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aoi Ito
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
74 of
114)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
53 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Zongyu Li
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Han Shi
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
89 of
120)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
60 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Maddison Inglis
75%
(
79 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
8
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
46 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Mayuka Aikawa
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
53 of
67)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
21%
(
5 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
12
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Indy De Vroome Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Indy De Vroome
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
18 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
44
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ziva Falkner
Player
Indy De Vroome
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
2
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
13
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Indy De Vroome
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
12
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Indy De Vroome
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Indy De Vroome
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
10
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Indy De Vroome
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Indy De Vroome
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
12
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
17%
(
2 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Indy De Vroome
Player
Julita Saner
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Indy De Vroome
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Inglis Vs Vroome Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Inglis are available here and Vroome photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
